Overall, the effective use of various rhetorical strategies is what makes the speech so valuable. Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. All rights reserved. He notes how essential it is to break silence before all hope is lost. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Registration number: 419361 He does not want the church leaders to simply listen to his message. He does this by appealing to certain issues the public see as important, using irony, and using diction and tone in persuasive ways. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes Americas involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. He uses the word 'We', connecting with the audience and ensuring them that together they will bring change to social conditions and attitudes. In the speech, Martin Luther King specifically indicates that America needs to end the war with Vietnam. new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Many great speeches are increasingly different. Martin Luther King notes that we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools (King). You are free to use it to write your own assignment, however you must reference it properly. The line, For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent, demonstrates how King uses parallelism. On April 4, 1967 Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a speech named, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence addressing the Vietnam War. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. By expressing how much he believes in the American dream and a new dawn, it reassures people that even though there is little progress at a time, King will always fight not only for himself, but his family, friends, and all those who are not held to the same respect. Since the founding of the Americas in the late 1400s, slavery was a problem; until the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1862. He includes various perspectives and addresses several counterarguments with the intention to prove the futility of war as a tool to address social, economic and political problems. Comparing the Justice System during the 1960s to a corrupt bank allows the audience to connect to what Dr. King is saying. The United States got involved in the Vietnam War because they wanted to stop the spread of communism. Rhetorical Mlk Speech "Beyond Vietnam". In short, this makes the audience more inclined to listen to the rest of Martin Luther king Jr's speech, as well as setting the bottom line that the Vietnam War creates devastating problems for everyone. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. He efficiently uses the anecdote to tell how he has spoken with young men, telling them how violence will not solve their problems. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. He offers many practical reasons for the opposition, as well as spiritual and moral reasons. He wants them to go back to their churches and spread the message. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. Martin Luther King (MLK) was an activist and a minister who claimed that the war on Vietnam was wrong. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. ' (Document, The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. While his I Have a Dream speech is considered his best one, his other speeches too offer a glimpse of his powerful rhetoric and his art of persuasion. The author here is using statistics to present the horrifying picture of the Vietnam War. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam. In this way, he tries to stress that even if we have progressed, we have grown nowhere better than the ancient barbarians that killed for fun. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. He uses metaphorical imagery, powerful diction,and symbolism to create an impact on the audience. Would you like to get a custom case study? "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. Favorite Quote:Failures help one grow as a person. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! He also reminds the church leaders of something seemingly obvious that they may have lost sight of: the Father is deeply concerned especially for his suffering and helpless and outcast children (13). He says, To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why Im speaking against the war (12). Finally, as the speech comes to a close, King writes, If Americas soul becomes totally poisoned, part of the autopsy must read: Vietnam. King goes so far as to suggest that the war will bring America to its death if it continues overlooking the problems Americans are facing at home. More importantly, King states that, the poor has been manipulated into believing a type of reality that simply isnt accurate or fair on their part. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. (King). In this way, while he successfully draws a parallel between the struggles of Vietnamese people and that of the Americans, he also lays the foundation for the next stages of his argument. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. For instance, he does when he depicts the, "Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools." Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. Copyright 2023 IPL.org All rights reserved. (21). King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. He spoke at Riverside Church in New York City, a venue that had a history of hosting progressive speakers and thinkers. King Jr delivered his "Beyond Vietnam -- A Time to Break Silence" in 1967 in NewYork City. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. He also focuses on the maltreatment of humanity, and how the Vietnam War is a start to the violence that occurs in America. Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. Rhetorical Devices In Beyond Vietnam Speech 736 Words3 Pages All they wanted was "to save the soul of America" (King, Beyond, 42). Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. Nothing could be lower than being placed parallel to the senseless violence of Nazi Germany. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it. Dr. King's purpose is . The American intervention came at a time when the Vietnamese were expecting freedom and peaceful life and it came in a manner that was even devastating compared to the French occupation. cite it correctly. His passionate tone flowed through these strategies, increasing their persuasive power on the people and encouraging them to follow/listen to his message on racial injustice. He successfully proves that The United States has done far more harm to the Vietnamese than good. America is overlooking its own poor and pouring resources into a war which does not offer any political, economic or social advantage. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. This is a logical fact with which no one can argue. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. Dream like you will live forever, live like you will die today. He also states, I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. Dr. King says that the war is draining valuable resources that could be helping the poor in our own country. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. us: [emailprotected]. Kings dialect showed the audience civil right issues, involving many rhetorical strategies using ethos, logos, and pathos, to a racially tempered crowd whom he viewed as different, but not equal. In the article "Beyond Vietnam", Martin Luther argues that war in Vietnam has far reaching affects that not only rapaciously take away America's resources, but make an immediate impact on African Americans perspective on the civil rights movement. He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. He states, Many people have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesnt address their oppressor, the U.S. government. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. 663 Words; Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism. He also makes an emotional plea by vividly describing the conditions in Vietnam. In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. For instance, he does when he depicts the, Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. The author is using pathos as one of his central rhetorical strategies. Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence, During the 20th century, the Vietnam War had a profound impact on Americans, but there was a side of the story that was less known- voices from the poor. King wants his audience. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break Silence.". Introduction Martin Luther King, Jr in his speech "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence" argued that US foreign policy was hypocritical when compared to the inequality present in the United States. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence" Rhetorical Analysis Introduction In this paper the speech "Beyond Vietnam" of Martin Luther king will be analyzed through the framework of Neo-Aristotelian criticism. By continuing well assume you board with our, Rhetorical Analysis on Kennedy Steel Speech, Rhetorical Analysis of The Mexican-American and the Chruch Speech, Analysis of Dr. Martin Luther Kings I Have a Dream Speech, Rhetorical Devices in Bill Clintons Speech at the Democratic Convention, Speech Analysis: Speech in the Virginia Convention, How to secure financing as a small business owner, How to Make a Business Plan for Any Business, 7 Crucial Macro Environment Factors to Include in Your Analysis, Macro Environment Examples in the Real World. He mentions that the war has led to the increase of violence in . Rhetorical Analysis Of Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence In the speech "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence," by Martin Luther King Jr. he expresses his opinion on how the Vietnam war is unjust. 4 May. We Will Write a Custom Case Study SpecificallyFor You For Only $13.90/page! King demonstates this by saying, In deep disappointment, I have wept over the laxity of the church. Retrieved from https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/, StudyCorgi. Then the segregation of African Americans and White Americans started. In his speech, Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr., uses appeals to emotion, appeals to credibility, and powerful diction to strengthen his argument and persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, "Beyond Vietnam - A Time to Break. This paper was written and submitted to our database by a student to assist your with your own studies. Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. If you use an assignment from StudyCorgi website, it should be referenced accordingly. Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Beyond Vietnam: A Time To Break Silence Martin Luther King Jr. in his speech, "Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, discusses the Vietnam war. Apart from the use of ethos, pathos and logos in his speech, he builds a rock solid argument by involving religious figures and facts from history and philosophy. Analyzes the literary device martin luther king jr. uses in his speech is allusions, adding to the importance on how awful the vietnam war was corrupting the united states. Through this speech, and his ideals of determination, many rhetorical devices are put to use to drive forth these points. He applies ethos to establish credibility, pathos to appeal to emotions, and logos to support his claims with hard evidence. The idea of nonviolence is much larger than ordinary people see. A lot of parts from Martin Luther Kings dream have come true, but it is still not all that is how King wanted it to be. Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. Therefore, to remain silent would truly be betrayal. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. To get his point through and make the meaning clear, King uses phrases like break the silence of the night, a vocation of agony, based upon the mandates of conscience, deeper level of awareness. Here, Martin Luther King Jr is getting the audience emotionally and completely invested by showing the effect of America in Vietnam on their lives. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. Additionally, Kings statement that Southeast Asia is eight thousand miles away strengthens the irony by making Southeast Asia seem like a place which is completely disconnected from America. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. Rodriguez 1 Melanie Rodriguez Ms. Jimenez Composition II 20 October, 2017 A Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Beyond Vietnam" "Never be afraid to do what's right. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam. This use of repetitive language conveys urgency and shows that he deeply believes the churches may influence the government if they speak against the war. This is an obvious and extremely effective argument, especially among a group of Christian church leaders. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. In Martin Luther King Jr.s speech Beyond Vietnam- A Time to Break Silence, delivered at Riverside Church in New York City on April 4, 1967, he claims that the American involvement in the Vietnam War is unjust. These statements serve to communicate to the audience that the speaker is someone of authority and should be listened to.
The Dresden Files Book 18 Release Date,
Tennessee Literacy Standards For Instructional Leaders,
Mlb Assistant General Manager Salary,
Private Tennis Court For Rent,
Loss Of Cervical Lordosis Car Accident Settlement,
Articles B